Monckton on "pulling Planck out of a hat"
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley My commentary written for Remote Sensing on the empirical determination of climate sensitivity, published by the splendid Anthony Watts some days ago, has aroused a...
View ArticleWhy there cannot be a global warming consensus
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley In a previous post, I explained that many of the climate-extremists’ commonest arguments are instances of logical fallacies codified by Aristotle in his Sophistical...
View ArticleMonckton's reply to Eos on Climate Denial
Christopher Monckton writes via email: Dear Anthony, – Ivar Giaever and I were subjected to an unprovoked and more than usually scientifically illiterate personal attack at some length in the AGU’s Eos...
View ArticleBenchmarking IPCC's warming predictions
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley The IPCC’s forthcoming Fifth Assessment Report continues to suggest that the Earth will warm rapidly in the 21st century. How far are its projections short of...
View ArticleOn CO2 residence times: The chicken or the egg?
While some model based claims say that CO2 residence times may be thousands of years, a global experiment in measurable CO2 residence time seems to have already been done for us. By Christopher...
View ArticleMonckton’s letter to the Rochester Institute of Technology regarding...
Earlier, I had mentioned Assistant Professor Lawrence Torcello’s despicable climate ugliness and offered some links to addresses on where to complain to. Monckton took the lead on that. I urge others...
View ArticleWhen will climate feedbacks fully function? Not for millennia
Guest essay by Christopher Monckton of Brencheley The splendidly-titled Alberto Zaragoza Comendador, commenting on my recent posting taking apart Mr. Mann’s latest fantasia in Scientific American, was...
View ArticleMonckton and Monty – dead parrot parody of IPCC
First, if you have not seen the Monty Python “dead parrot” sketch in your lifetime, before you read the satire from Christopher Monckton below, watch this video. Just click on the thumbnail at right....
View ArticleIPCC has at least doubled true climate sensitivity: a demonstration
Guest essay by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Roger Taguchi, who often circulates fascinating emails on climatological physics, has sent me a beautifully simple and elegant demonstration that IPCC...
View ArticleGlobal warming on trial and the elementary error of physics that caused the...
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley This will be a long posting, but it will not be found uninteresting. Global warming on trial: Global warming goes on trial at 8.00 am this Wednesday, 21 March 2018,...
View ArticleClimatology’s startling error – an update
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley Well, we sent out our paper On an error in defining temperature feedback to a leading journal for review. The reviewers did not like it at all. “And, gracious! How...
View ArticleClimatology’s startling error of physics: answers to comments
Answers to comments from the original essay on WUWT, here. By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley I make no apology for returning to the topic of the striking error of physics unearthed by my team of...
View ArticleA big thank you from the front line in the war for free speech
By Christopher Monckton of Brenchley To all the kind and generous readers who have donated to the appeal for Naomi Seibt, I should like to say how very grateful she…
View ArticleAs The Elite Posture And Gibber, The New Pause Shortens By A Month
In the end, it will become impossible for governments to conceal from their increasingly concerned citizens the fact that there has not been and will not be all that much global warming; that for just...
View ArticleWhy Climate Skepticism Has Not Yet Succeeded
An interesting instance of all four failings was a 2400-word rebuttal directed at me that was published here recently.
View ArticleMonckton Announces a Sustainable-Energy Startup: Invest Now!
Let me end with the statutory warning before you send me your very large check: “Investments can go up, and up, and up, as well as up.”
View Article